Regulatory Influence & Standards Leadership

Shaping the future of AI governance through policy engagement, regulatory alignment, and standards development. ETHRAEON's constitutional framework as reference implementation for EU AI Act compliance.

⚖️ EU AI ACT ALIGNED

Regulatory Compliance Framework

Constitutional AI governance designed for regulatory alignment from day one

🇪🇺

EU AI Act

COMPLIANT

ETHRAEON's T5-Rigid architecture directly maps to EU AI Act requirements for high-risk AI systems.

  • Article 14: Human Oversight ✓
  • Article 12: Record-Keeping ✓
  • Article 15: Accuracy/Robustness ✓
  • Article 10: Data Governance ✓
View Mapping
📋

ISO/IEC 42001

ALIGNED

AI Management System standard compliance through CCT, ANCHOR, and EPOCH governance surfaces.

  • 4.1: Organization Context ✓
  • 6.1: Risk Management ✓
  • 8.1: Operational Planning ✓
  • 9.1: Monitoring & Measurement ✓
View Documentation
🔒

GDPR Compliance

COMPLIANT

Data sovereignty, privacy-by-design, and constitutional data governance with Iceland VPS infrastructure.

  • Data Minimization ✓
  • Purpose Limitation ✓
  • Right to Be Forgotten (In Dev)
  • EU Jurisdiction (Iceland) ✓
Privacy Policy
🛡️

SOC 2 Type II

IN PROGRESS

Enterprise security and operational controls with constitutional audit trails and monitoring.

  • Security (Planned 2025)
  • Availability (99.95% SLA)
  • Confidentiality (Encryption)
  • Privacy (GDPR Aligned)
Roadmap

Policy Briefs & Position Papers

Thought leadership on constitutional AI governance and regulatory frameworks

December 2025 Regulatory Framework

Constitutional AI as EU AI Act Reference Implementation

Position paper arguing that ETHRAEON's T5-Rigid architecture provides a practical reference implementation for EU AI Act Article 14 (Human Oversight) requirements. Demonstrates how constitutional governance addresses high-risk AI system compliance.

Target Audience EU AI Office, Regulators
Impact Standards Influence
Status Published
Read Brief Download PDF
November 2025 Technical Standards

ΔSUM Attribution Protocol for AI Systems

Technical specification proposing ΔSUM (Change → Integration → Eternalization) as industry standard for AI decision attribution and audit trails. Addresses regulatory requirements for explainability and accountability.

Target Audience ISO, Standards Bodies
Impact Protocol Definition
Status Published
Read Brief Download PDF
October 2025 Policy Position

Human Sovereignty Preservation in AI Governance

Policy brief arguing that AI governance frameworks must architecturally enforce human authority rather than procedurally recommend it. Critiques "human-in-the-loop" as insufficient without T5-Rigid enforcement.

Target Audience Policymakers, Ethics Boards
Impact Philosophical Foundation
Status Published
Read Brief Download PDF

Standards Development & Engagement

Active participation in AI governance standards and best practices development

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42

Artificial Intelligence technical committee participation

OBSERVER
EU AI Office

Regulatory consultation and reference implementation collaboration

CULTIVATING
IEEE Ethics in AI

Ethical AI standards development and best practices

TARGET
Partnership on AI

Industry collaboration on responsible AI development

TARGET